Mr. Bean II
Angela 3
Music Times
Cibbuano
TyronneMetallica looking to jump on internet MP3 bandwagon
June 2nd 2008 01:56
After the incredible success of Radiohead and Nine Inch Nails attempt to give away their album for free, Napster-hating band Metallica is eager to line their pockets with more gold, hoping that fans don't remember the days when Lars Ulrich and the boys screamed vile hatred against their fans that dared to download their songs.
Now, of course, the RIAA is running out of steam, music has gone digital and its looking like giving away albums for free made Radiohead a lot of money.
In fact, go ahead - download the In Rainbows album right now.
Those jingly-jangly coins have given Metallica metal stiffies, though, and they're leaping up to the web with a 'hey guys! Us too!', releasing their latest album DRM-free.
Wired has an interesting summation of the response to the news.
The comments on the page reflect the general consensus... most people are so angered by the idea, the hypocrisy, that they're condemning the album.
Well, except for the few Metallica-fans that would bleed for the band:
Ah, (c)rap music. How much we love thee. Otherwise known as (c)hip (c)hop, which is not some kind of bizarre English seaside/Chinese veggie fusion dish, it's a hilarious misnomer.
The entire issue raises an interesting point about music... it's easy for us to say that artists should just want people to listen to their music, but musicians obviously want to make a living from their work. When is it too much?
I think, if anything, we've seen the internet be used for incredible promotion, from OK Go, to Weezer's latest, "Pork and Beans".
Now, of course, the RIAA is running out of steam, music has gone digital and its looking like giving away albums for free made Radiohead a lot of money.
In fact, go ahead - download the In Rainbows album right now.
Those jingly-jangly coins have given Metallica metal stiffies, though, and they're leaping up to the web with a 'hey guys! Us too!', releasing their latest album DRM-free.
Wired has an interesting summation of the response to the news.
"But when we first posted about Metallica's plans for some sort of Radiohead-style release, the response was overwhelmingly negative."
The comments on the page reflect the general consensus... most people are so angered by the idea, the hypocrisy, that they're condemning the album.
Well, except for the few Metallica-fans that would bleed for the band:
"anyone who trashes mettalica clearly has no real taste in music. So fine, everyone go out and buy the new Britney CD and the new Fergie and the newest (c)rap album of the month. Metallica is one of the most influential bands in music history, period, end of story. How many bands do you know who have lost a bassist (one of the greatest bassists of all time none the less) and survived long enough and stayed on the top of the charts with each and every CD released to lose and replace ANOTHER bassist and finally release a new CD and reach number 1 on the music charts their first week more than 20 years after their debut in music culture? anyone? no? thought not, so please stop sharing your opinions. You're obviously all a bunch of preteens who know nothing about the power of the 80's on music culture today. Show a little respect, you twits"
Ah, (c)rap music. How much we love thee. Otherwise known as (c)hip (c)hop, which is not some kind of bizarre English seaside/Chinese veggie fusion dish, it's a hilarious misnomer.
The entire issue raises an interesting point about music... it's easy for us to say that artists should just want people to listen to their music, but musicians obviously want to make a living from their work. When is it too much?
I think, if anything, we've seen the internet be used for incredible promotion, from OK Go, to Weezer's latest, "Pork and Beans".
| 87 |
| Vote |
Comments (5)
Add Comments
